A Florida personal-injury firm

The engagement · chapter 08 · after the audit

The build

What happened after the owner approved build 1. The firm's templates became executable rules, the systems connected without a single migration, and the agent ran three weeks in training mode before anything went live. The audit was the blueprint; this is the construction log.

8templates compiled
23rules extracted & confirmed
5unwritten rules captured from interviews
3 weekstraining mode before go-live

Templates into rules

Every rule is deterministic, written in plain language, and confirmed by the person who owns it — no black box. A sample of the 23:

  • R1
    The carrier and claim address are never retypedthe letter of representation to the at-fault carrier uses template v4; both fields come from the intake recordconfirmed: intake paralegal
  • R2
    The PIP application drafts only when the policy carries PIPotherwise the pack flags it as a named blockerconfirmed: assigned attorney
  • R3
    Referrals come only from the maintained provider listcurrently accepting liens, reviewed quarterlynew rule — born from audit finding K1
  • R4
    The crash report is ordered on signaturefrom the state portal, automatically; the file shows “ordered · watching” until it landsnew rule — born from audit finding K2
  • R5
    Deadlines are computed, never rememberedPIP window and statute date from the crash date, written to the calendar with their arithmetic shownconfirmed: case manager

System integration — zero migration

Three connection methods across the six mapped systems. The firm's tools stayed exactly where they were.

connected
API
API integrationread intake & case data, write drafts and recordsClio · DocuSign · Google Calendar
connected
W
Watched portalorder on signature, watch for arrivalthe FLHSMV crash portal
connected
ING
File & call ingestiontranscribe intake calls, read carrier replies, version templatesphone calls · Gmail · Google Drive templates

Training mode — three weeks beside the team

The agent drafted every document for every new case; the team kept working by hand. Each week, the drafts were compared against what the team actually sent.

14%week 1
drafts corrected
4.2%week 2
0%week 3 — accepted
  • Week 125 documents compared · 14% needed correction — template-version drift and two carrier-address rules fixed.
  • Week 231 documents compared · 4.2% corrections — the letter-of-protection wording aligned with the attorney's edits.
  • Week 328 documents compared · 0 corrections on 10 consecutive cases — build 1 accepted, per the roadmap's written criterion.

The approval configuration

Who releases what. Below the line, nothing moves without a person.

StepDrafted / prepared byReleased byNever automated
Intake & conflict checkagent, from the call transcriptparalegal confirmsclient conversations
Retaineragentparalegal sendsfee terms
The document packagent, from the firm's templatesattorney, per documentevery outbound send
Provider referralagent suggests from the listparalegal confirmsthe medical choice itself
Claims & calendaragent prepares, computes datescase manager confirmsstatute-date overrides
Prepared by /analog · part of the car-crash case study.
open daily · 24/7 · +1 (786) 370-9416 · hello@slashanalog.com · privacy notice